On 11/27/2009 03:21 PM, Dave Korn wrote:
you and Paolo are pretty much the only people who feel that it should have been backed out
Uh? I said that the repository should have been made readonly if there was a concrete possibility of backing out the patch, be it with svn cp (which we already did a couple of times that trunk disappeared ;-) and svn blame works great) or by manual editing.
Paolo
