On 6/7/10, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Diego Novillo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 14:09, NightStrike <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> threads that haven't been addressed. I offered to Ian to do the same
> >> thing for the whole mailing list if we can make it a policy that
> >> people who commit changes do what Kai is doing so that it's clear that
> >> the thread is done with. I don't mind throwing a few pings down, and
> >> I already have the whole ML tagged with a gmail label.
> >
> > Seems like a good idea to me. I do not usually read the list every
> > day (or every week some times), so if a patch is in my area and I had
> > not been directly CC'd, it can take me up to 2 weeks to get to it.
> >
> > Most of the areas I'm on had good coverage (particularly since I share
> > much with richi who is a very prolific patch reviewer), so it's not
> > too much of a problem.
>
> Ok. Is one person responding enough for me to start doing that? I
> don't know how this sort of approval / acceptance process works for
> GCC.
Excellent idea and thanks for volunteering..
M
