On 6/7/10, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote:
>  > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 14:09, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  >> threads that haven't been addressed.  I offered to Ian to do the same
>  >> thing for the whole mailing list if we can make it a policy that
>  >> people who commit changes do what Kai is doing so that it's clear that
>  >> the thread is done with.  I don't mind throwing a few pings down, and
>  >> I already have the whole ML tagged with a gmail label.
>  >
>  > Seems like a good idea to me.  I do not usually read the list every
>  > day (or every week some times), so if a patch is in my area and I had
>  > not been directly CC'd, it can take me up to 2 weeks to get to it.
>  >
>  > Most of the areas I'm on had good coverage (particularly since I share
>  > much with richi who is a very prolific patch reviewer), so it's not
>  > too much of a problem.
>
>  Ok.  Is one person responding enough for me to start doing that?  I
>  don't know how this sort of approval / acceptance process works for
>  GCC.

Excellent idea and thanks for volunteering..

    M

Reply via email to