On 06/07/2010 11:16 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Can you expand? What kinds of process changes would be reasonable to > make? > Following the terminology "irregular contributor", per Jeff message, I would not consider unreasonable for irregular contributions to use more extensively and consistently the patch-queue, which we have been using for some time. In that way all the patches would be perfectly tracked, as far as I can see. The last days I have been traveling, thus sorry if I missed parts of the discussion, but I don't understand why the patch-queue mechanism is not being seriously considered...
Paolo.
