NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 14:09, NightStrike <nightstr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> threads that haven't been addressed. I offered to Ian to do the same >>> thing for the whole mailing list if we can make it a policy that >>> people who commit changes do what Kai is doing so that it's clear that >>> the thread is done with. I don't mind throwing a few pings down, and >>> I already have the whole ML tagged with a gmail label. >> >> Seems like a good idea to me. I do not usually read the list every >> day (or every week some times), so if a patch is in my area and I had >> not been directly CC'd, it can take me up to 2 weeks to get to it. >> >> Most of the areas I'm on had good coverage (particularly since I share >> much with richi who is a very prolific patch reviewer), so it's not >> too much of a problem. > > Ok. Is one person responding enough for me to start doing that? I > don't know how this sort of approval / acceptance process works for > GCC.
I would say that since you did not get any objections, you should try it. Of course, you may well get objections at that point, in which case we should take the conversation back here. Thanks for volunteering. Ian
