On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:24 PM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > He understood your point very well. That is why Frank said, "You > falsely presume zero vetting."
Maybe I didn't get the zero vetting part, then. I thought I did, but apparently not. What does that mean in this context? Google isn't telling me. > Do you realize that your email message convey a very smug tone? No, I do not realize that. I was intending to speak matter-of-fact-ly.
