On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:11:43PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Sep 9, 2010, at 12:19 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Perhaps a rational approach would be to contact whoever at Apple > > currently is > > charged with maintaining their objc languages about the issue. > > Apple does not have an internal process to assign code to the FSF anymore. I > would focus on the code that is already assigned to the FSF.
To clarify, anything not checked in on gcc.gnu.org somewhere must be assumed to be copyright Apple, not copyright FSF, and has not been contributed, and Apple has no plans to contribute more code. However, anything on gcc.gnu.org has been contributed. I understand that the main issue is that Apple objects to GPLv3, but the exact reason doesn't necessarily matter that much.
