On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing
> >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course). No idea whether
> >> this is technically possible of course.
> > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task.
> > If we really want to do that, I can update the current post-commit
> > hook script [1].
>
> I'd love to see that and will be happy to work on this with you,
> apply a patch, etc.
>
> Let's give others the chance to chime in, and if there are no
> objections within the next two days, let's proceed. Fair?
I'd say it should go into a pre-commit hook instead of
post-commit, if possible. So that when one checks in some particular
revision DATESTAMP already has the right timestamp.
Jakub
