On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote: > >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing > >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course). No idea whether > >> this is technically possible of course. > > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task. > > If we really want to do that, I can update the current post-commit > > hook script [1]. > > I'd love to see that and will be happy to work on this with you, > apply a patch, etc. > > Let's give others the chance to chime in, and if there are no > objections within the next two days, let's proceed. Fair?
I'd say it should go into a pre-commit hook instead of post-commit, if possible. So that when one checks in some particular revision DATESTAMP already has the right timestamp. Jakub