On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:32:51PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Dongsheng Song wrote: >> >> The DATESTAMP change could also be in a post-commit hook (doing >> >> nothing if the date didn't change, of course). No idea whether >> >> this is technically possible of course. >> > Yes, the post-commit hook can do this task. >> > If we really want to do that, I can update the current post-commit >> > hook script [1]. >> >> I'd love to see that and will be happy to work on this with you, >> apply a patch, etc. >> >> Let's give others the chance to chime in, and if there are no >> objections within the next two days, let's proceed. Fair? > > I'd say it should go into a pre-commit hook instead of > post-commit, if possible. So that when one checks in some particular > revision DATESTAMP already has the right timestamp.
I wonder if it can go into the same commit even? Richard.
