On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Alec Teal <a.t...@warwick.ac.uk> wrote: > > It was said before (when this first started) that Go wasn't ready. Another > language that looks cool but has yet to mature.
Side issue clarification. I believe that Go is ready for any use one might care to put it to. The reasons I believe it is not suitable as a default-enabled language for GCC have to do with licensing and source code issues, not with the language or the compiler support for it. Ian
