On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:39 PM Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Points for consideration: > > 1. Do we want some kind of rearrangement of refs as in the 1b > repository or not? > Maybe? How much space does that save in a clone? How much work does a partial clone add on the server, since the server needs to pack up the objects for the partial clone rather than just transmitting its own packs? > 2. Should the final converted repository contain refs/deleted/ refs or > not? > I think not. > 3. Where an attribution comes from an author map rather than a > ChangeLog file, do we wish to use the existing author map or do people > prefer using names from that map but with @gcc.gnu.org addresses (and > @gnu.org for usernames that only committed in the gcc2 period)? > I lean toward the latter. Jason
