Please refer to the *Exemptions* section listed in the link below https://www.commerce.gov/about/policies/source-code
--------------------- Christopher Dimech General Administrator - Naiad Informatics - GNU Project (Geocomputation) - Geophysical Simulation - Geological Subsurface Mapping - Disaster Preparedness and Mitigation - Natural Resource Exploration and Production - Free Software Advocacy > Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 7:46 PM > From: "Siddhesh Poyarekar" <siddh...@gotplt.org> > To: "Gabriel Ravier" <gabrav...@gmail.com>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org > Subject: Re: A suggestion for going forward from the RMS/FSF debate > > On 4/18/21 1:15 PM, Gabriel Ravier via Gcc wrote: > > I'd like to see a source for that. It certainly seems like complete > > bullshit to me, unless you're trying to tell me that they simultaneously > > do not fund anything related to free software while also having policy > > that mandates at least 20 percent of custom-developed code (i.e. code > > they fund the production of) has to be released as OSS (see > > https://www.commerce.gov/about/policies/source-code) > > You see Free != OSS... > </troll> >
