On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:49, Richard Kenner <ken...@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> wrote: > > > Depends on the use cases. Not in military surveillance. And certainly not > > at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. At Boeing could be the same, but > > I'm not sure. Before 2011, rather than building things from scratch, > > washington bureaucrats simply picked from among existing technology. But > > things had really been going berserk around 2008. From 2017 onwards, > > I'm somewhat in the dark. They could have started allowing some ownership > > rights, but ownership rights under government contracts are very different > > than ownership rights under commercial contracts. > > I can't understand your point with this version either. Sorry.
I don't understand these ramblings either. LLNL sure seems to have flirted with LLVM: https://www.llnl.gov/news/nnsa-national-labs-team-nvidia-develop-open-source-fortran-compiler-technology https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1608523 https://github.com/rose-compiler/rose/wiki/Install-ROSE-with-Clang-as-frontend
