Hi Siddhesh, On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 01:17:14PM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 2022-10-04 13:10, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > > I made and shared this copy to dispel any further false speculation of > > > scope creep of the GTI proposal. > > > > Who is doing the false speculation? Do you have a mailing list link? > > It would be interesting to know who's got it wrong. > > Mark asked upthread if content on gnu.org is also going to be migrated over
I did indeed. Both the proposal and these minutes mention migrating websites without mentioning any specifics. Knowing which websites are meant and why they need migration is useful information. The FSF tech team is helping us coordinating things on overseers to help with release archives, mirroring, backups and sourceware continuity. If this is about migrating websites currently on www.gnu.org then talking to the FSF tech team does make sense. If it isn't about that, then we will simply note that and move one. We do take this proposal, and all other suggestions people make about the sourceware infrastructure, seriously, but a lot of details of this proposal are still unclear. We are trying to get as much details as possible so we can see how this fits into the current sourceware roadmap, get a better understanding of the budgetary needs, file sourceware infrastructure bugs with those details. All to get a better understanding what the real needs are and document the necessary steps forward. Cheers, Mark
