Hi Peter, Peter TB Brett writes: > [...] > I'm pretty certain you've got this already in your personal SCM. If you can > export ***incremental*** patches from your SCM between some known CVS > revision and where you want the tree to be, I can then load them up and > rebase them for you.
You can get them here: http://www.chbcp.net/~pat/geda/libgeda.cleanup.tar.gz http://www.chbcp.net/~pat/geda/gschem.cleanup.tar.gz This is what I have in my SCM so far. The remaining portions are almost ready but not knowing what will happen next I haven't worked on them lately. > [...] > My biggest concern is that your development tree is so far diverged from > what > you said your initial point was (tag 'rel_20061020', I believe) that for you > to merge with head is going to be something of a nightmare, with a high > probability of causing regressions. Even doing the manual merge in the > patchset I just posted was painful, with several tricky conflicts in libgeda > and gschem. I already did it. Well almost: I have merged my changes with HEAD (and posted the diffs), not rebasing on HEAD. Once again, the only big problem I see is the refactorings on the get_bounds functions. Regards, Patrick _______________________________________________ geda-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-dev
