Le 08/02/2012 09:32, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : ...
no problems from my side. i don't especially like the _name_ [gemvertexbuffer] (it is too similar to [gemframebuffer] (which goes well with [gemwin]), but the functionality/usage is very different), and if it was made into an abstraction, all the better.
i don't have any objection changing this name : this object is so new that nobody should have already used it. cheers cyrille
one could also use something like [pix_texture], that applies textures that it either generated itself (from a pix) or that was generated somehow else (by taking the texture id in it's 2nd inlet). but i'm not so sure that this scales well for the different VBO types. fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk8yMy0ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTSEgCeOrsIy34fUJO0K7K1yxxZ0+Tz d5sAnigbwBE47x3mq7zrhxkYlo7sUI+7 =0fBX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
