Let me take a closer look... sorry, I've been very busy lately.

Steve

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Nilay Vaish <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1153/#review2948
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Any comments on this patch?
>
> - Nilay Vaish
>
>
> On June 4, 2012, 7:35 a.m., Nilay Vaish wrote:
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> > http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1153/
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > (Updated June 4, 2012, 7:35 a.m.)
> >
> >
> > Review request for Default.
> >
> >
> > Description
> > -------
> >
> > Changeset 9037:bf70b0132328
> > ---------------------------
> > ISA Parser: Allow predication of source and destination registers
> > This patch is meant for allowing predicated reads and writes. Note that
> this
> > predication is different from the ISA provided predication. They way we
> > currently provide the ISA description for X86, we read/write registers
> that
> > do not need to be actually read/written. This is likely to be true for
> other
> > ISAs as well. This patch allows for read and write predicates to be
> associated
> > with operands. It allows for the register indices for source and
> destination
> > registers to be decided at the time when the microop is constructed. The
> > run time indicies come in to play only when the at least one of the
> > predicates has been provided. This patch will not affect any of the ISAs
> that
> > do not provide these predicates. Also the patch assumes that the order in
> > which operands appear in any function of the microop is same across all
> the
> > functions of the microops. A subsequent patch will enable predication
> for the
> > x86 ISA.
> >
> >
> > Diffs
> > -----
> >
> >   src/arch/isa_parser.py 6385cf85bf12
> >
> > Diff: http://reviews.gem5.org/r/1153/diff/
> >
> >
> > Testing
> > -------
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nilay Vaish
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> gem5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev
>
_______________________________________________
gem5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/gem5-dev

Reply via email to