-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/342/#review559
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/arch/arm/tlb.cc
<http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/342/#comment812>

    It seems to me like we ought to have a generic check in the CPU models that 
prevents prefetches to uncacheable locations rather than burying this in the 
TLB and requiring every ISA to make this check.  (Which leads to the question 
of how/whether this is handled in other ISAs...)


- Steve


On 2010-12-06 16:12:26, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/342/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-12-06 16:12:26)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and 
> Nathan Binkert.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> O3: Fixes the way prefetches are handled inside the iew unit. This patch
> prevents the prefetch being added to the instCommit queue twice.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/arch/arm/faults.hh 2b5fbdcbfb5d 
>   src/arch/arm/tlb.cc 2b5fbdcbfb5d 
>   src/cpu/o3/iew_impl.hh 2b5fbdcbfb5d 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/342/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to