Ben, Thanks for your confirmation. Yes, it is still unsubmitted. We plan to post the new version this week.
Cheers, Yuanlong > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:48 AM > To: Jiangyuanlong > Cc: Russ Housley; Stephen Farrell; Jari Arkko; Sheng Jiang; Barry Leiba; > Alvaro > Retana; Stewart Bryant; draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree....@ietf.org; IETF > Gen-ART; > The IESG; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A > Subject: Re: Resolution on comments of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10 > > Hi, > > This (I assume still unsubmitted) version addresses my IESG ballot > comments. > > Thanks! > > Ben. > > On 11 Dec 2015, at 5:16, Jiangyuanlong wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Thanks a lot for your reviews. > > Based on all the comments received during the IESG evaluation, we have > > prepared a tentative version 11 for this draft. > > We believe all the comments are resolved, but please check whether you > > have any concerns with the texts in this version. > > > > If there are no further comments, we will upload it as the formal > > revision 11 version. > > > > Best regards, > > Yuanlong > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A [mailto:db3...@att.com] > >> Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2015 11:03 PM > >> To: Jari Arkko > >> Cc: Jiangyuanlong; Russ Housley; > >> draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree....@ietf.org; IETF > >> Gen-ART; IETF > >> Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of > >> draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10 > >> > >> Hi Jari, > >> > >> Yes, we'll be doing a new revision for addressing other comments. > >> > >> I've asked for today's telechat if no discusses to mark it as > >> approved, revised > >> draft needed. > >> > >> Much thanks Russ for your review! > >> > >> Deborah > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: > >>> > >>> Many thanks for your detailed review, Russ! > >>> > >>> Yuanlong, will there be a new draft version or other edits before > >>> the draft > >>> is approved? > >>> > >>> Jari > >>> > >>>> On 17 Nov 2015, at 00:53, Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanl...@huawei.com> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Russ, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks a lot for your review and good observations. > >>>> Please see my comments in line. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> Yuanlong > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Russ Housley [mailto:hous...@vigilsec.com] > >>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 1:28 AM > >>>>> To: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree....@ietf.org > >>>>> Cc: IETF Gen-ART; IETF > >>>>> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10 > >>>>> > >>>>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General > >>>>> Area Review > >>>>> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the > >>>>> IESG for > >>>>> the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document > >>>>> shepherd or AD > >>>>> before posting a new version of the draft. > >>>>> > >>>>> For more information, please see the FAQ at > >>>>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > >>>>> > >>>>> Document: draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-10 > >>>>> Reviewer: Russ Housley > >>>>> Review Date: 2015-11-13 > >>>>> IETF LC End Date: 2015-11-24 > >>>>> IESG Telechat date: unknown > >>>>> > >>>>> Summary: Almost Ready > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Major Concerns: None > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Minor Concerns: > >>>>> > >>>>> Sections 4.1 and 5.3.1 inclues a reference to [802.1Q-2011]. > >>>>> Should this be > >>>>> the 2014 version of the document? If not, please add the > >>>>> informative > >>>>> reference for [802.1Q-2011]. > >>>> [YJ] Yes, all these should refer to [802.1Q-2014]. > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Other Editorial Comments: > >>>>> > >>>>> The Abstract should appear on the title page. > >>>> [YJ] OK. > >>>> > >>>>> Section 3 needs a reference for MEF 6.1: > >>>>> s/Specification MEF 6.1/Specification MEF 6.1 [MEF6.1]/ Also, > >>>>> [MEF6.1] > >>>>> needs to be added as a normative reference. > >>>> [YJ] All these will be updated to MEF 6.2. > >>>> > >>>>> Section 3 needs a reference for IEEE 802.1Q-2003: > >>>>> s/B.1.3 of IEEE 802.1Q-2003/B.1.3 of IEEE 802.1Q-2003 > >>>>> [802.1Q-2003]/ Also, > >>>>> please add an informative reference for [802.1Q-2003]. > >>>> [YJ] Yes, we will add an informative reference for [802.1Q-2003]. > >>>> > >>>>> Third level section headings do not have space between the section > >>>>> number > >>>>> and the section title. For example: > >>>>> s/5.3.1.PW Processing/5.3.1. PW Processing/ > >>>> [YJ] OK. > >>>> > >>>>> In Fig 4, there is room to shift the figure to the right, this > >>>>> will allow the "AC" > >>>>> labels to fit better on the left: > >>>>> > >>>>> +----------------------------------------+ > >>>>> | VPLS-capable PE model | > >>>>> | +---------------+ +------+ | > >>>>> | | |==========|TVSI-1|------------ > >>>>> +---+ AC | | ------------ |------------ PWs > >>>>> |CE |----------| Bridge ------------ |------------ > >>>>> +---+ | | | Root & +------+ | > >>>>> | | Module | Leaf VLAN o | > >>>>> | | | o | > >>>>> | | | o | > >>>>> | | | o | > >>>>> | | | o | > >>>>> +---+ AC | | | VLAN-n +------+ | > >>>>> |CE |----------| ------------VSI-n |------------- > >>>>> +---+ | | |==========| |------------- > >>>>> PWs > >>>>> | | | ^ | |------------- > >>>>> | +---------------+ | +------+ | > >>>>> | | | > >>>>> +-------------------------|--------------+ > >>>>> LAN emulation Interface > >>>>> > >>>>> Figure 4 A VPLS PE Model for E-Tree with a Single T-VSI > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> [YJ] OK. > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Gen-art mailing list > >>>> Gen-art@ietf.org > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > >>> _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
