On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:51 AM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suspect people have been hesitant to remove the information because it's
> not clear why it was added in the first place; on the whole, Wikimedians
> are content collectors rather than content removers, unless they are very
> comfortable that the information being removed is of no significant value
> or is actively harmful.
>
> Having a quick glance, I see comments like "no women were elected to
> Arbcom" for projects that don't have Arbcoms, and references to no women on
> projects that don't exist for that language group.
>
> As the majority of the data was completed by Laura (thanks for all your
> research!), perhaps she could help the list to understand what the
> intention was in including some of this information.
>
Indeed.
Has this been answered in a different thread or on a talk page somewhere?
I too am puzzled by the data in the "Perspectives" section, and I share
Lodewijk's concern about drowning out interesting data points with a lot of
meaningless ones.
Asaf
--
Asaf Bartov <asaf.bar...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
