it's the kind of other stuff exist argument that goes on all the time during deletion discussion, (that may not be appropriate here)
a better example might be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Weinstein "If the event is significant and the individual's role within it is substantial and well-documented—as in the case of John Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan in 1981—a separate biography may be appropriate. The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources." On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Nathan <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Leigh Honeywell <le...@hypatia.ca> wrote: > >> With my mod hat on, Neotarf, please cease the "you could"'s here. Further >> hypotheticals will get you modded. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Leigh >> > > What about Neotarf's post, which you quoted, would merit moderation and > under what principle? It seemed perfectly civil and constructive to me, > even if Neotarf does miss the point a bit as Risker noted. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
