Please avoid using Examiner articles. Unreliable sources...it's user created content like Wikipedia.
And what Nathan said. Please tread lightly. (From personal experience!!) Sarah On Dec 24, 2014 8:22 AM, "Nathan" <nawr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Carol Moore dc <carolmoor...@verizon.net > > wrote: >> >> >> http://www.examiner.com/article/wikipedia-biographies-favor-men >> >> http://www.examiner.com/article/jimmy-wales-shows-favoritism-on-wikipedia >> hmmm, interesting.... but dated... >> >> http://www.examiner.com/article/number-of-women-going-down-on-wikipedia >> >> Merry Solstice! >> See my video - http://merrysolstice.com >> >> >> > Carol, are you familiar with that author and his history with the > projects? He's not exactly an objective journalist (or a journalist of any > kind, actually). > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org > To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please > visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
