Quoting John Hebert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Well, then I don't have any problems and was mistaken > about my initial assumptions. > > If only they provided minimal install options (why the > heck do I need the Japanese font?) similar to Mandrake > 8.2, then I'd be happier. But I'm just whining. > > In any case, I'm deploying/administrating Linux on a > production public server and getting paid for it. Can > it get any better than this? :) > > John Hebert > > --- Paul Rushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Redhat is listed on the LSB website as a > > contributor. Redhat follows > > (most) of FHS 2.2. LSB uses RPM for package > > installation. Redhat's > > runlevels match LSB. I guess I'm not seeing the > > problems you are talking > > about. Any specifics? > > > > I haven't seen any distribution that completely > > adheres to LSB, yet. > > Debian doesn't, and I've seen lots of arguments on > > the debian lists about > > how much they should change to accomodate LSB. > > > > > > > ulp. Now I've stirred the penguinmonster... > > > > > > Basically, my peeve is that RH isn't behind the > > LSB > > > project, and use slightly different UNIX > > conventions > > > that other LSB backers. Why not? Or should I just > > not > > > care about that? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >
-- ============================ Paul Rushing [EMAIL PROTECTED] ============================ ------------------------------------------------- This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
