At 03:09 PM 6/12/2002 -0700, you wrote: >Well, then I don't have any problems and was mistaken >about my initial assumptions. > >If only they provided minimal install options (why the >heck do I need the Japanese font?) similar to Mandrake >8.2, then I'd be happier. But I'm just whining. > >In any case, I'm deploying/administrating Linux on a >production public server and getting paid for it. Can >it get any better than this? :)
Not often. What exactly are you implementing? Regards, Dustin >John Hebert > >--- Paul Rushing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Redhat is listed on the LSB website as a > > contributor. Redhat follows > > (most) of FHS 2.2. LSB uses RPM for package > > installation. Redhat's > > runlevels match LSB. I guess I'm not seeing the > > problems you are talking > > about. Any specifics? > > > > I haven't seen any distribution that completely > > adheres to LSB, yet. > > Debian doesn't, and I've seen lots of arguments on > > the debian lists about > > how much they should change to accomodate LSB. > > > > > > > ulp. Now I've stirred the penguinmonster... > > > > > > Basically, my peeve is that RH isn't behind the > > LSB > > > project, and use slightly different UNIX > > conventions > > > that other LSB backers. Why not? Or should I just > > not > > > care about that? > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup >http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net --- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> UNIX and Network Consultant http://members.telocity.com/~dpuryear PGP Key available at http://www.us.pgp.net In the beginning the Universe was created. This has been widely regarded as a bad move. - Douglas Adams
