On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:41:25PM -0800, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Greg Stein wrote: > > > If you want to fix the oversight in J-C, then do so. Personally, I don't > > > believe it is possible, for the reasons that Robert has already described. > > > But I certainly won't stop you from trying. > > > > Greg, can you expand upon what you see as the "oversight" problem in > > Jakarta-Commons? I'm not sure what you mean by that. > > This feels like it is getting off-topic, although there is still some > relevance since A-C is quite similar to J-C.
Thanks for taking the time to respond here. I disagree with some (although not all) of these assertions, but since as you note this is beginning to push to bounds of on-topic discussion, I won't try to debate them here. I do have one question regarding this: > Take things like Hivemind, Jelly, and whatstheotherone. In the list that > Stephen posted recently, he labeled these as "should be TLPs." What the > *heck* are they doing way down in J-C if they are TLP material? How could > Hivemind grow to become a framework while sitting in Commons without > anybody really saying, "wow. that needs to move." Just to make sure I undestand you, is your concern here that these projects are (a) out of scope for jakarta (b) out of scope of jakarta commons or (c) too large for jakarta commons, or (d) some combination of the above? > > Cheers, > -g > - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/>
