On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:01:18PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 06:32 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:33:30PM -0500, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > >> ... > > >> Why not just free j-c to be a TLP if it wants to? > > > > > > Why would the board be inclined to create a *second* Commons project > > > when the first one they created should be sufficient? > > > > The second one has well-known and widely used code and years of > > established community? > > And the Board would simply respond with something like, "well, why doesn't > that community operate as part of the A-C TLP?" > > > Look. Geir, Rodney: if you guys don't believe in A-C, then fine. You don't > have to. But some others do, and it appears that some J-C components will > move. Why is that so threatening? So much to reply to and so hard to be excited. The only reasoon why the board should accept J-C being promoted is that up until now the board has been pushing for J projects that want to become TLP to stand up and be counted. This holds for everything but J-C? > If you want to fix the oversight in J-C, then do so. Personally, I don't > believe it is possible, for the reasons that Robert has already described. > But I certainly won't stop you from trying. I believe they are utterly fixable. Hen
