Hi, Manoj:

The options you provide seem to be missing the namespace (and a quote) for the 
parse function, but I assume that's a copy and paste error.

As you've probably already found, custom constraints are explained by:

http://docs.marklogic.com/guide/search-dev/search-api#id_49750

My first step would be to set the <debug> flag to true in the options.  If that 
doesn't help, some detail about your parse and finish facet functions might be 
useful.


Erik Hennum

________________________________
From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com 
[general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] on behalf of manoj viswanadha 
[manoj.viswana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 3:39 AM
To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Creating custom facets using custom 
constarints in Rest API

Hi all,

I am exploring the options of creating custom facets. I got the option of using 
custom constarints mentioned in REST API document.

I am using the below options:

< constraint name="lesson">
   < custom facets="true">
   < parse apply="parse" ns= " at="/facets.xqy" />

   <finish-facet apply="finish-facet"
   ns="http://marklogic.com/rest-api/transform/facets"; at="/facets.xqy"/>
       </search:custom>
    <range collation="http://marklogic.com/collation//S2"; type="xs:string" 
facet="true">
      <facet-option>ascending</facet-option>
      <facet-option>limit=10</facet-option>
      <path-index>*:level[@level_number=2]/*:title</path-index>
  </search:range>
  </constraint>

The Service i am calling is:

 
http://localhost:portno/v1/search?q=&options=test&format=xml&collection=Resources&view=facets

When i use custom option  i am not getting results and when i remove custom 
option i am able to get results. Does custom constraints work for facets?

Can anyone help me in this. I want to change the default structure of facets.

Thanks in advance,
Manoj.
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to