On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2012, at 10:46 PM, Eli Collins wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >>> Arun, great work below. Concrete, and an actual proposal of PMC lists. >>> >>> What do folks think? >> >> I don't see how it helps. This substantially *increases* the size of >> the PMC for HDFS, I don't even recognize a bunch of names on this >> list. Unless we're actually going to try to make the HDFS project >> represent the people who actually contribute and run the project we're >> just replicating the current situation across 3 projects. 5+ hdfs >> patches in the last year seems like a pretty low bar to me. > > > Fine. Could you please provide us with an alternate for consideration? >
Todd's list seems more in line with the goal of reducing project members to reflect the actual community. I see Chris' point about the community issues, however I also see Todd's point that splitting the projects does not address these issues while bringing real overhead and rolling back things we've done recently to un-split the projects (per the vote thread I'm in favor of combining the committer lists even if we later split projects). In short, I'm open to a project split and willing to discuss, I don't yet see sufficient benefits to provide a concrete proposal myself. Thanks, Eli
