HI Hadoopers, I am a user and big fan for Hadoop. I can see lot of great discussions here. Most of them talks about the access rights and technical problem in split. I don't see many members contributing to projects, but they have access looks like. If they are not contributing, why access required? Generally I will watch the mails in community. Some people not even published and i can see their names in list you have proposed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310942&statistictype=assignees&selectedProjectId=12310942&reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.reports%3Apie-report&Next=Next https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ConfigureReport.jspa?projectOrFilterId=project-12310941&statistictype=assignees&selectedProjectId=12310942&reportKey=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.reports%3Apie-report&Next=Next I am curious to know how that many people got access in Map Reduce/HDFS. when you think they are separate, Todd proposed list is more close to the above links and looks to be true contributors. Take the correct information rather than messing up... I too think that, it is good to split and have a lists like Todd proposed and take the list for YARN from Arun. This is just my thought. I may not know many things here. Please ignore this mail, if I misunderstood some things in community. -thx On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:22 AM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2012, at 4:48 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> I am curious where the arbitrar numbery 5 is coming from: is it > reflected in > >> the bylaws? > > > > Nope, I picked it based on Arun's earlier picking of the same number > > in the YARN thread. We have no bylaws about what would happen in the > > eventual TLP-ification of subcomponents, of course. > > I'm sure you just missed it - but, I want to set the record straight: I > picked 20+ patch contributions or 10+ review/commits since *project > inception*. > Your pick seems to be just commits in last 12 months. I have put forth > one, please put forth another proposal if you like. However, please, do > include patches, not just commits. > > For e.g. I'd propose we add llu@ for HDFS since he's done a ton of work > on metrics2 recently. My bad for missing that initially - apologies Luke. I > might have missed more, pls ping me or add yourself. I've put my proposal > up on http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HDFS_MR_YARN_TLP_Proposal. > > We could also revisit issues like emeritus after the split to allow each > project to figure it's own norms - I'd urge for that option. > > thanks, > Arun > >
