On 7/29/03 4:41 AM, "Berin Lautenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steven Noels wrote: >> But being careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water. I > would have said there is real value in the Incubator defining and > fleshing out a process that is used by the various PMCs for incubation. > It might even oversite the process at a high level to ensure > consistency accross all incoming projects. > Which hasn't been done in coming up on 1 year. You feel that the progress to that effect will increase? Lets face it, if Nicola wants to do that, he will regardless of whether there is an incubator ;-) > I think there might also need to be someone to look after projects that > are going to come in at the top level - i.e. not under the auspices of > another Apache project. A lot of the current Incubator documentation > focuses on that case. > Ahh now this is ultimately what the board would delegate presumably. However do you feel that the incubator PMC has a larger role to play here or the sponsoring member/infrastructure? > (Harping on a subject) - a charter/mission statement would be good :>. > The stuff on wiki is a first stab at roles and responsibilities - can we > start with that and flesh out? > The problem with bureaucracy (I'm not using this as the negative connotation, this is a bureaucracy by dictionary definition) is the distribution of responsibility and credit is demotivating. -Andy > Cheers, > Berin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Andrew C. Oliver http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI http://jakarta.apache.org/poi For Java and Excel, Got POI? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
