James Strachan wrote:
The only disagreement is - should all this dynamically generated stuff go into CVS or not. It seems silly to put it into CVS - since its trivial to regenerate the site at any point using Maven. Its worse than saying lets check every version of a jar into CVS.
we had this discussion at length and quite some time ago. people are pretty much committed to their positions by now, so unless there are a lot of new people, or a lot of the old people have left, all that bringing it up again will do is be an irritant. :-)
I wonder if the current size of the cvs modules involved (e.g. xml-site) might reinforce some of those old arguments against use of CVS?
I also wonder if there is not an opportunity here with forrestbot to look at a new approach?
Just being an irritant :>.
Cheers,
Berin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
