Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > I think the initial decision was that a PPMC was not necessary as the code was > just going to be imported into the MyFaces project. Therefore, the MyFaces > PMC > is responsible for executing the duties that a PPMC would normally do. > > Perhaps we need to clarify these types of situations. What have we done for > mod_ftp, for example? My glance at the status page says that there isn't a > PPMC either. So, I'd guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] would control adding new > committers to > it. I guess... > > Anyone else have an opinion? Any other examples? -- justin >
For Derby we had a PPMC which was useful for personnel discussions. On graduation responsbility was transferred to the DB PMC. On Tuscany we don't have a PPMC or other private forum - we've added committers so far based on adhoc discussions. I think that is problematic as it provides no visibility to either the Incubator or WebServices PMCs on how those decisions are being made. I think it would be a good idea for every podling to have such a forum so that the committers involved can become familiar with Apache's way and so that the IPMC can perform its oversight role. This also provides new committers with exposure to PMC responsibilities which is valuable if the podling graduates into an existing project and essential if it exits as a TLP. -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
