Re: [pre-proposal] AsyncWeb

[peter royal]

On Jul 15, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

Honestly, I'd recommend flipping it: get MINA to be TLP first and then
move in AsyncWeb.  There's no reason that AsyncWeb should land in the
Directory TLP and then move again in short-order.

Good point.

If you submit the resolution ASAP, it'll make it into this month's Board

meeting (which is likely to be Wednesday, but that's not confirmed
yet).

k, what's the deadline for adding to the meeting agenda?

The working-copy of the draft is at: <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ directory/sandbox/proyal/MINA-TLP-Proposal.txt?view=markup>

thanks!

-pete


--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature