Alex Karasulu wrote: > > ... > I'm fine with this option as well. Let's give it a try. Do the rest of > you guys agree with this approach? > ... >
I think moving asyncweb within a Mina TLP would be very healty for the project. One thing I would like to discuss though is identity.... AsyncWeb currently has some form of identity in its own right as a project (and is already bundled as a standalone http transport in a couple of OSS projects). Is this likely to be affected by a move to a Mina TLP? E.g, Mina currently has its own identity within the Directory project. Are we talking about a similar set up here? Or does asyncweb become "Mina HTTP"? It would be interesting to hear others views on this - and particularly Trustins when he returns. Dave -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-pre-proposal--AsyncWeb-tf1931092.html#a5357990 Sent from the Apache Incubator - General forum at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
