Thanks Sebb, Just to be clear, is this a minus 1 vote from you? If so, I'll roll it all back and restart the process.
mike On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/05/2010, Mike Rheinheimer <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > IPMCers, > > > > Wink 1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list. > > I'm now calling the IPMC vote to release Wink 1.1 (incubating) per the > > process indicated here: > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-incubator-release-vote > > > > The Maven staging area is at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-007/ > > > > The distributions are in: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-007/org/apache/wink/apache-wink/1.1-incubating/ > > > > This release is tagged at: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating > > (revision 941046) > > > > AL headers are missing from: > > > wink-common/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/javax.ws.rs.ext.RuntimeDelegate > wink-examples/ext/WebDAV/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/application-dav > > The Wink download page does not have a link to the KEYS file; this > should be fixed before any release please. > > Also, the SNAPSHOT downloads should not be listed on the public > download page. Only approved releases should be made generally > available. > > It would be useful to include details of how to use sigs and hashes to > check downloads. > > > The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours (ending Friday, May 14, > > 10:45am US CST). Please indicate your vote: > > > > [ ] +1 to release Wink 1.1 incubating > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 NOT to release Wink 1.1 incubating (and why) > > > > Thanks! > > > > mike > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
