----- Original Message ----
> From: Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:28:17 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> Ant,
>
> My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals
> from ppmc's who end up in ipmc would help build bridges
> between podlings and will help get lessons learned (when any ppmc
> has issues/problems/roadblocks) back to their ppmc.
> This is one area where i've seen people struggle, folks from
> different projects learning the same lessons the hard way.
Good point.
> I am not too worried about "binding" vote one podling ppmc
> member have over another podling's release. the "binding" is
> for me a legal thing (as in we need 3 binding ipmc votes for a release).
I think ant is more concerned about graduation votes. We
could simply write a new rule that podling committers on
the IPMC brought in through my initiative MUST ABSTAIN from
graduation votes. I don't think the board would be the
least bit upset if we did that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
