>> >> +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making >> >> process for voting in new committers (one question, >> >> would they need an ACK from IPMC - similar to how PMC's >> >> send a note to the board for an ACK for new pmc members)? >> > >> > That certainly sounds like a reasonable thing to do, sure.
+1 >> >> In the 2nd question, "significant committers", are we asking >> >> mentors to identify such candidates for addition to IPMC, >> >> especially release managers for example? if so, +1 for that >> >> as well. >> >> I was also curious as to the mechanism for determining >> "significance"--I would be satisfied with mentors' >> recommendation as outlined by dims. > > By significant I mean active and clueful participants > in the project. > >> I wonder if there should be some limit/function >> to determine the number of non-Member representatives >> a given podling may have on the IPMC. > > I don't care for artificial limits. Trust has a way > of maintaining its own balance. > +1 Both ideas sound very good to me Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
