Greg Stein wrote on Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 14:26:24 -0400: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 14:03, Craig L Russell <craig.russ...@oracle.com> > wrote: > > I don't care what you call them in the project. I'm asking that you use > > Apache terminology when discussing things among the wider Apache community.
@Craig, thanks for clarifying your position/point. > The report is consumed by the svn community, too. They reviewed it and > provided feedback. It uses terms from the svn community. > > >... > >> In particular: lines 1710,1711,1717 of r24487 of the board agenda. > > > > Yes. I'd prefer to keep translations out of the discussion with the wider > > Apache community. If translation is needed (someone in the subversion > > community wants to understand the board report) then that's a matter for the > > subversion community not the wider Apache community. > > The svn-specific terms are basically parentheticals to the overall > report, so have no particular impact on its content. That's exactly what I was thinking: the report uses the ASF-wide terms ("committer" and "PMC Member") first, and only later adds the svn-specific bits (translations or concrete semantics) of those terms. This way seems to serve both those acquainted with the svn community structure and those unacquainted with it. > If any Directors > have an issue with those terms, then I would expect to see it in the > commentary section. Unless/until then, I'm going to avoid tweaking the > report since its current form has already been reviewed/accepted by > two Directors. > > Cheers, > -g --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org