Speaking wearing a hat: There is no requirement for monolithic releases. The project can choose whatever units it likes to release, so long as each one of them is fully buildable from the materials voted on in the release. If they want to hold one vote on 400 of them, well, it casts some doubt on whether the voters actually tried them all, but then again many TLPs inspire doubt in my mind as to whether voters are actually testing all the source packages.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:52 AM, <dav...@apache.org> wrote: > Totally agree. > > Best regards, > > David Bosschaert > > On 21 November 2011 16:32, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> wrote: >> I still think that the release is a proper release - as Karl explained >> we could have done "better" source releases per module etc., but there >> is nothing fundamentally wrong. >> I don't think that these issues should block the project from graduation >> either. >> >> Carsten >> -- >> Carsten Ziegeler >> cziege...@apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
