Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Christian Grobmeier > > <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz > >> <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> 3. The Champion is not necessarily a mentor. > >> > >> Not sure if that actually makes sense. I think a Champion is a mentor > >> by default somehow... > > > > Not if a podling PPMC member is elected as a Champion as the podling progresses. > > Hm... it feels wrong somehow. If a pre-incubation Champion must be a > $x-Member to enable a new podling, then the incubation Champion should > be an $x-Member too.
Its someone willing to be answerable to the IPMC, why do they need to be a member? > I can already hear the questions: "Can I serve as > a Champion, I am not a committer, but would like to bring this project > to the asf". The proposal is not to change the role of pre-incubation champion. As for in-incubation, its a position of merit, so Joe someone, the non-committer is not eligible. Ross On Nov 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote:
