On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, "Rob Weir" <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >... > > I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a > > failure to understand and integrate with the Foundation's thoughts on > > the matter. Or to at least politely discuss the situation on > > legal-discuss. > > I would say the lack of understanding could be in both directions, and > some greater tolerance would be mutually beneficial.
I *am* being tolerant (you should see my intolerant emails). And what makes you believe that I don't understand? I get to offer my thoughts, and you do not get to say that I have a "lack of understanding" simply because you disagree. > Remember, OpenOffice is unlike anything else previously at Apache. Duh. Don't be so patronizing. Again: I suggest the discussion about making authorized/authenticated binaries be moved to legal-discuss. Not here. Infrastructure may need to provide some input, too. I might also point you to Sam's recommendation to avoid over-posting to a thread as a way to dominate / get your way. How many emails are you up to so far? -g
