On Tue, Dec 18, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > Personally, I'm not against nagging. Actually, when I'm on the receiving > > end, I usually appreciate it, as timeliness is not a quality I am widely > > praised for. > > > > Some podlings are in a position that is different from TLPs - they are > > new to the whole thing, and may therefore require a little more help > > than we would expect a TLP to need in remembering their > > responsibilities. However, if I were needing to nag a podling that is > > otherwise near graduation, I'd perhaps be worried. > > > > The DNR marker is still important though, and we should be sure that we > > don't 'over-nag'. We encourage (more earlier in the process of > > incubation, less later) and if after a few nags they don't do it, then > > DNR is just fine. > > > I want, at least, a *quick* way to find out how many DNR's are > pending, and be able to make informed decisions about nagging. So I > plan to go ahead with the template that allows a tool to tell who is > missing.
Seems reasonable to me. Upayavira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
