On 22.12.2014 17:42, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Thus, to me, the choice is really about #1 and #3. So perhaps, the > path forward is to try #3 first and then, if things don't improve, go > all the way to #1. Please let me know what do you think.
+1 >> Sure, we might reduce the number of projects coming into the foundation >> but (IMHO) that is not a problem. Our goal as a foundation is not to be >> large, it is to be high quality. > But it is to be high quality on the level of understanding of the 'Apache Way' > which has very little to do with the quality of code, documentation or any > other piece of technology. That's my take as well. Meritocracy; community structure; when to vote and especially when *not* to vote; requirements for releases, etc. and the reasons for all of the above are the things that a mentor should be expected to keep an eye on. Especially at the beginning of incubation, because bad habits are harder to break later on. -- Brane --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
