A simple question regarding the SGA... at the bottom there's "List of software and other intellectual property covered by this agreement:". I wonder if we should have "Freemarker" under that, or something like:
Freemarker (including the engine itself, also the Docgen and Site modules) Because, the Freemarker project contains multiple projects technically: Docgen (generates HTML from XDocBook), Site (generates Web site from some XML-s), and the engine itself (freemarker.jar). Only the last is released to the Maven Central Repo. When people say Freemarker, they usually just mean the last artifact (the engine). So I thought the SGA is ambiguous if we just say "Freemarker". -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Wednesday, June 3, 2015, 2:11:29 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 8:07 PM Ralph Goers > <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > IMO, once the source code is migrated to the ASF you should not do > any more releases outside the ASF. I would attempt to clear up as > many IP issues as you can before entering but I believe several > projects have resolved their IP issues while in the incubator. In > the worst case some code may need to be rewritten. > > > Agreed, considering the contributor list on the code base is small > (5 contributors) with the bulk of it from you, it shouldn't be an > issue. You'll want to check w/ your eventual mentors > > - Contributors/committers have ICLAs. > - SGA passing ownership to the ASF > - A thorough review of the code base validating things like > headers, proper ownership are all transferred. > > It's one of the easier things to do, but typically neglected. > > John > > Ralph > >> On Jun 2, 2015, at 4:54 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: >> >> But before that... a question. Let's say the voting has a positive >> result. Can we still do Freemarker releases outside ASF (with the >> current owners and source code repository) after that? For how long? >> My concern is that when we are already in the incubator, we can't >> release from it as far as ASF finds that there are unsettled IP >> issues. Like if someone finds out that an SGL is needed from X who we >> haven't seen in the last 15 years, that can take a while, which is OK, >> but until that I can't do releases (and in general I can't be sure >> what will happen with the work committed). Is it possible to only >> enter incubation when there are no known blockers that would make >> releases impossible? Or how does it work? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> Thursday, May 28, 2015, 4:11:49 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Jacopo Cappellato >>> <jacopo.cappell...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> ...PS: who should start the vote?.. >>> >>> In general that's the role of the podling's champion. >>> >>> -Bertrand >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org