Sorry Jim. As an attempt to shut down a thread, this wasn't a very good one. Not a single poster in this thread has a problem with the word, or the concept of, "review". It is the process that is the issue and what the impact of that process is upon a community.
Ralph > On Nov 26, 2015, at 6:50 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > OK, ok... we are at diminishing returns here with people > no longer, imo, listening to what others are saying... > > We have, as a foundation, and HAVE HAD RTC and CTR for years > and decades. There are times when one or the other are Good > and when they are Bad. Those exact times will, generally, > vary depending on a lot of factors. > > We use the right process when it is Good. > > We don't use it when it is Bad. > > Just as 'meritocracy' is not a bad word, as much as > some people wish to re-define it as such, neither is the > word 'Review'. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
