> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF > > On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: > > >As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is > >required, the NOTICE file is used. > > Sorry, I should have been more clear. When I said "consider NOTICE" I > meant that any NOTICE for the non-ASF AL dependency may have content that > needs to into the NOTICE and not LICENSE. > > > > >If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the > >same Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file > >already contains the appropriate license. > > Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE > that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE. > > -Alex
Got it. Thanks Alex & Craig for the clarifications. -Steve --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
