> On Mar 7, 2016, at 1:43 PM, Steve Varnau <steve.var...@esgyn.com> wrote: > >> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 7, 2016 1:09 PM >> To: general@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: LICENSE info for ALv2, not ASF >> >> On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is >>> required, the NOTICE file is used. >> >> Sorry, I should have been more clear. When I said "consider NOTICE" I >> meant that any NOTICE for the non-ASF AL dependency may have content that >> needs to into the NOTICE and not LICENSE. >> >>> >>> If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the >>> same Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file >>> already contains the appropriate license. >> >> Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE >> that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE.
That’s what I was objecting to. LICENSE is for licenses. If notice is required, then use NOTICE. Craig >> >> -Alex > > Got it. Thanks Alex & Craig for the clarifications. > > -Steve > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > Craig L Russell Architect craig.russ...@oracle.com P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
