On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Looking back through the discussion, it is a bit of a problem that one of > the major reasons given for the fork is that the team thought that they > didn't have a large enough PMC and that incubation wouldn't get them enough > additional contributors. That made it seem like the project should go > forward without meeting Apache requirements (i.e. outside). > > Is the situation really that different now that a vastly diminished team is > likely to benefit from incubation enough to form a viable TLP? > > (I hate that this sounds negative ... it is a real question)
We can't tell you. It is just, that some of us (including me) have the feeling/opinion, that going through the Incubator is the path, where the chances are best to attract new committers. Jochen -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the wheel!" http://www.keystonedevelopment.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/evolution-of-the-wheel-300x85.jpg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
