On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:06 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Christopher wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:34 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Another possible option would be to move it to our CMS. >>> >>> That would bring us SVN for the people who prefer vi, but also a graphical >>> UI for editing. >>> And it would make people make familiar with our CMS. >> >> >> I prefer the Wiki over CMS. I find CMS to be clumsy and annoying. I'm glad >> the projects I'm involved in no longer use (or never have used) it. I'd be >> willing to use SVN (reluctantly, and with git-svn), but if it were tied to >> CMS, there'd still be the second publication step using CMS which would be >> annoying. >> >> There is something to be said about the low barrier to entry of a Wiki, >> though. Anybody can do it. It's the least developer-centric way of doing >> things out there. I know CMS tries to be that, but it hasn't quite >> succeeded. > > Why not make a whimsy-like application for this? That would ensure that > you are only meddling with the specific sub-section of the report you > are working on, and would allow multiple people to work on the report at > the same time, maybe even have a simple sign-off button for mentors?
Or even adapt the current board agenda application to take a different data source? You could have svn as a data source, and have a web interface. > Shouldn't take long to make that :) > > With regards, > Daniel. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
