Romain, I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time. IMHO there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys.
I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off due to lack of content in your report. The current report doesn't seem to be much better. I pinged JB off list, so far no answer there either. - John On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions in > general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are issues with > the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining why and > what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you pointed out > it was "too empty" for you but I'm not sure there is a list I'm not aware > of but it would have been completely silently ignored cause batchee@ > wouldn't have been notified of that. > > More generally it is quite hard to fill this report for stable projects > (which doesn't mean they are not alive but just they are stable enough to > not get as much activity as BigData projects ;)). I'm not sure we should > group them either in a new umbrella project or an existing one - typically > we could create an inconsistent bucket in term of user communities but > consistent in term of maintainers/asf guys - or just keep it like that but > this "issue" will come back regularly I think and it would be great to > "skip" these round trips if possible and have a clear statement about > projects having by design an irregular activity - thinking to EE projects > which have a big activity after spec releases then mainly just maintenance > until next round. > > You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small projects be > swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of lifecycle/activity issue > and avoid to create inconsistent (user) communities but I have to admit I > don't have a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that area. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-08-08 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> > > wrote: > > > > > John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments I did > > > today. > > > > > > > > Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and > paste). > > > > > > > The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also > sending > > > a mail to the respective podling if you have feedback. > > > > > > > I know that I've personally sent feedback/questions to BatchEE before, > > without any response from the podling. > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/262e43b2bb49d1ef5058a74f43b4f7 > > c1e4ec6b9fb4f5896d28e95918@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/044be9dc4b10136a7025ca5e031b33 > > 12e2dee8b93680483a754b594e@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > > > > - John > > > > > > > > > > That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much easier. > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
