2016-08-08 17:57 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > Romain, > > I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time. IMHO > there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys. > > Ok so this shouldn't be understood as a blocker to graduate.
> I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off due to > lack of content in your report. The current report doesn't seem to be much > better. I pinged JB off list, so far no answer there either. > > Will check as well. Thanks John! > - John > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > > Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions in > > general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are issues > with > > the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining why and > > what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you pointed > out > > it was "too empty" for you but I'm not sure there is a list I'm not aware > > of but it would have been completely silently ignored cause batchee@ > > wouldn't have been notified of that. > > > > More generally it is quite hard to fill this report for stable projects > > (which doesn't mean they are not alive but just they are stable enough to > > not get as much activity as BigData projects ;)). I'm not sure we should > > group them either in a new umbrella project or an existing one - > typically > > we could create an inconsistent bucket in term of user communities but > > consistent in term of maintainers/asf guys - or just keep it like that > but > > this "issue" will come back regularly I think and it would be great to > > "skip" these round trips if possible and have a clear statement about > > projects having by design an irregular activity - thinking to EE projects > > which have a big activity after spec releases then mainly just > maintenance > > until next round. > > > > You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small projects be > > swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of lifecycle/activity > issue > > and avoid to create inconsistent (user) communities but I have to admit I > > don't have a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that area. > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-08-08 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments I > did > > > > today. > > > > > > > > > > > Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and > > paste). > > > > > > > > > > The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also > > sending > > > > a mail to the respective podling if you have feedback. > > > > > > > > > > I know that I've personally sent feedback/questions to BatchEE before, > > > without any response from the podling. > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/262e43b2bb49d1ef5058a74f43b4f7 > > > c1e4ec6b9fb4f5896d28e95918@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/044be9dc4b10136a7025ca5e031b33 > > > 12e2dee8b93680483a754b594e@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E > > > > > > - John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much easier. > > > > > > > > txs and LieGrue, > > > > strub > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
